Mauruce Dassah., Uganda,
Africa
Abstract
‘Participation’
has become a buzzword in local governance discourse alongside ‘voice’,
‘inclusion’ and ‘responsiveness’. Declining civic participation, alienation of
grassroots-level citizens from mainstream decision-making in representative
democracy and increasing distance between citizens and government are
democratic deficits globally. These factors make direct democratic
participation of citizens in local governanceessential for sustainable
development. Advocates of public participation for sustainable local
development are convinced an engaged grassroots citizenry is better than a
passive one. Given the opportunity, grassroots citizens can actively engage in
making and shaping policies directly affecting their own lives and, thus, be
makers and shapers of policy, rather than play the passive role of users and
choosers of interventions or public services. Arnstein’s ‘ladder of
participation’ (1969) and Burns, Hambleton and Hoggett’s ‘ladder of citizen
empowerment’ (1994) show that participation involves a continuum of various
degrees of power and powerlessness. In many advanced democracies, public
participation in local affairs is deemed sacrosanct, but in emerging
democracies, particularly in Africa, participation often comes across as a
benevolent gesture bestowed on less powerful citizens by the more powerful.
This theoretical paper argues that genuine public participation of grass-roots
citizens is vital for sustainable local developmentand requires a localism
agendawith empowerment as its ultimate goal. Consequently, local governments
need to engage citizens using participatory methods that resonate with the
higher levels of Arnstein’s ‘ladder of participation’ and Burns’, Hambleton and
Hoggett’s ‘ladder of citizen empowerment’. Through literature analysis, the
paper pinpoints the nexus between public participation and sustainable
development and discusses key facets of public participation,paving the way for
a discussion of three innovative participation approaches with potential for
yielding sustainable development outcomes: participatory budgeting, citizens’
juries and consensus conferences.
Abstract


Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
For yout correction, write your comment in here. Thank you.
(Tulislah komentar anda di sini untuk perbaikan. Terima kasih)